Ab urbe condita 8.1
When messengers from Setia and Norba arrived in Rome with complaints of
a defeat they had suffered at the hands of the revolted Privernates,
the consulship was held by C. Plautius (for the second time) and L.
Aemilius Mamercus. News was also brought that an army of Volscians led
by the
people of Antium had concentrated at Satricum. Both wars fell to
Plautius. He marched first to Privernum and at once engaged the enemy
who were defeated without much trouble The town was captured and then
given back to the Privernates after a strong garrison had been placed
in it; two-thirds of their territory were confiscated. Then the
victorious army was led against the Antiates at Satricum. There a
battle was fought with terrible bloodshed on both sides, and whilst the
result was still uncertain night separated the combatants. The Romans
were in no way discouraged by the indecisiveness of the conflict, and
prepared for battle the next day. The Volscians, after reckoning up
their losses in the battles, were by no means eager to run any further
risk; looking upon themselves as defeated, they made a hurried
departure to Antium in the night, leaving their wounded and a part of
their baggage behind. An immense quantity of arms was found both
amongst the dead on the field and in the camp. These the consul said he
was offering to Lua Mater. He then ravaged the enemy's territories down
to the sea-board. When the other consul entered the Sabellian
territory, he found that the Samnites had no camp, no legions
confronting him. Whilst he was laying waste their fields with fire and
sword, envoys came to him to ask for peace and he referred them to the
senate. After permission had been given them to state their case, they
laid aside their truculent manner and requested that peace might be
granted them and also the right of making war against the Sidicines.
They considered that they were the more justified in making this
request because they had formed friendly relations with Rome when their
affairs were prosperous, not as in the case of the Campanians when they
were in adversity, and they were taking up arms against the Sidicines,
who had always been their enemies and never friends of Rome, who had
not, like the Samnites, sought its friendship in a time of peace, nor
like the Campanians, asked for its help in a time of war, and who were
not under the protection and suzerainty of Rome.
Ab urbe condita 8.2
The praetor, T. Aemilius, put these demands to the senate, and they
decided that the former treaty should be renewed with them. The reply
given then by the praetor was to the effect that it was no fault of the
Roman people that the friendship with them had not remained unbroken,
and there was no objection to its being re-established since they
themselves were weary of a war brought on them by their own fault. As
to the Sidicines there was nothing to prevent the Samnites from being
free to make either peace or war. After the treaty was made the Roman
army was at once withdrawn. The men had received a year's pay and three
months' rations, for which the consul had stipulated, that he might
allow time for an armistice until the envoys returned. The Samnites
advanced against the Sidicines with the same troops that they had
employed in the war with Rome, and they were very hopeful of effecting
an early capture of the city. Then at last the Sidicines took steps to
make a surrender of themselves to Rome. The senate rejected it as being
made too late and forced from them by extreme necessity. They then made
it to the Latins who were already in arms on their own account. Even
the Campanians did not refuse to take part in the hostile movement, so
much keener was their sense of the injuries inflicted by the Samnites
than of the kindness shown them by Rome. One immense army, composed of
these many nationalities and under Latin leadership, invaded the
Samnite country and inflicted more disasters by ravages than by actual
fighting. Although the Latins proved superior in the various
encounters, they were not loath to retire from the enemy's territory
lest they might have to fight too often. This allowed the Samnites time
to send envoys to Rome. When they were admitted to an audience they
complained to the senate that they were suffering more now that they
were in treaty with them than they had before, when they were enemies;
they very humbly requested them to be satisfied with having snatched
from them the victory they had won over the Campanians and the
Sidicines, and not permit them, in addition, to be conquered by these
most cowardly people. If the Latins and Campanians were really under
the suzerainty of Rome they should exert their authority to keep them
off the Samnite land, if they renounced that suzerainty they should
coerce them by force. They received an ambiguous reply, for the senate
shrank from acknowledging that the Latins no longer recognised their
authority, and on the other hand they were afraid, if they reprimanded
them, that they might alienate them altogether. The circumstances of
the Campanians were quite different; they were bound not by treaty but
by the terms of surrender, and they must keep quiet whether they would
or no. There was nothing in their treaty with the Latins which
prevented them from making war with whom they pleased.
Ab urbe condita 8.3
With this reply the Samnites were dismissed, quite uncertain as to what
the Romans were going to do. But its effect was to completely estrange
the Campanians, who now feared the worst, and it made the Latins more
determined than ever, since the Romans refused any further concessions.
Under the pretext of making preparations for a Samnite war, they held
frequent meetings of their national council, and in all the
consultations of their leaders they hatched plans in secret for war
with Rome. The Campanians also took part in this movement against their
preservers. But in spite of the careful secrecy with which everything
was being conducted- for they wanted the Samnites to be dislodged from
their rear before the Romans made any movement-some who had friends and
relatives in Rome sent hints about the league which was being formed.
The consuls were ordered to resign before the expiry of their year of
office in order that the new consuls might be elected at an earlier
date in view of such a formidable war. There were religious
difficulties in the way of the elections being held by those whose
tenure of office had been curtailed, and so an interregnum commenced.
There were two interreges, M. Valerius and M. Fabius. The latter
elected T. Manlius Torquatus (for the third time) and P. Decius Mus as
consuls. It was in this year (341 B.C.), it appears, that Alexander,
King of Epirus, landed in Italy, and there is no doubt that had he been
fairly successful at first that war would have extended to Rome. This,
too, was about the time of the achievements of Alexander the Great, the
son of this man's sister, who, after proving himself invincible in
another region of the globe, was cut off, whilst a young man, by
disease. Although there could be no doubt as to the revolt of their
allies-the Latin league-still, as though they were concerned for the
Samnites and not for themselves, the Romans invited the ten chiefs of
the league to Rome to give them instructions as to what they wanted.
Latium at that time had two praetors, L. Annius of Setia and L.
Numisius of Cerceii, both belonging to the Roman colonists. Through
these men not only had Signia and Velitrae, themselves Roman colonies,
but the Volsci also been instigated to take up arms. It was decided
that they should be particularly invited by name. No one had the
slightest doubt as to the reason for this invitation. A meeting of
their council was accordingly held prior to their departure; they
informed those present that they had been asked by the senate to go to
Rome, and they requested them to decide as to what reply they should
give with reference to the matters which they had reason to suppose
would be discussed.
Ab urbe condita 8.4
After various opinions had been expressed, Annius spoke as follows:
"Although it was I who put the question to you as to what answer should
be given, I still think that it is of more importance to the interests
of the State to decide what must be done rather than what must be said.
When our plans are developed it will be easy enough to fit words to
facts. If even now we are capable of submitting to servitude under the
shadowy pretext of a treaty on equal terms, what is to prevent us from
deserting the Sidicines and receiving our orders not only from the
Romans but even from the Samnites, and giving as our reply that we are
ready to lay down our arms at the beck and call of the Romans? But if
your hearts are at last touched by any yearning for independence; if a
treaty, an alliance, an equality of rights really exists; if we are at
liberty to boast of the fact that the Romans are of the same stock as
ourselves, though once we were ashamed of it; if our army, which when
united with theirs doubles their strength, and which the consuls will
not dispense with when conducting wars which concern them alone-if, I
say, that army is really an army of their allies, then why are we not
on an equal footing in all respects? Why is not one consul elected from
the Latins? Those who possess half the strength, do they possess half
the government? This is not in itself too much honour for us, seeing
that we acknowledge Rome to be the head of Latium, but we have made it
appear so by our prolonged forbearance.
"But if ever you longed for an opportunity of taking your place in the
government and of making use of your liberty, now is the time; this is
the opportunity which has been given you by your own courage and the
goodness of the gods. You tried their patience by refusing to supply
troops. Who doubts that they were intensely irritated when we broke
through a custom more than two centuries old? Still they put up with
the annoyance. We waged war with the Paelignians on our own account;
they who before did not allow us the right to defend our own frontiers
did not intervene. They heard that the Sidicines were received into our
protection, that the Campanians had revolted from them to us, that we
were preparing an army to act against the Samnites with whom they had a
treaty, they never moved out of their City. What was this extraordinary
self-restraint due to but to a consciousness of our strength and of
theirs? I have it on good authority that when the Samnites were laying
their complaints about us they received a reply from the Roman senate,
from which it was quite evident that they themselves do not now claim
that Latium is under the authority
of Rome. Make your rights effective by insisting on what they are
tacitly conceding to you. If any one is afraid of saying this, I
declare my readiness to say it not only in the ears of the Roman people
and their senate but in the audience of Jupiter himself who dwells in
the Capitol, and to tell them that if they wish us to remain in
alliance with them they must accept one consul from us and half their
senate." His speech was followed by a universal shout of approval, and
he was empowered to do and to say whatever he deemed to be in
furtherance of the interests of the State of Latium and of his own
honour.
Ab urbe condita 8.5
On their arrival in Rome, the senate assembled in the Capitol and
granted them an audience. T. Manlius, the consul, acting on the
instructions of the senate, recommended them not to make war upon the
Samnites, with whom the Romans had a treaty, on which Annius, as though
he were a conquerer who had captured the Capitol by arms instead of an
ambassador protected by the law of nations, said: "It is about time,
Titus Manlius and senators, that you gave up treating us as though you
were our suzerains, when you see the State of Latium raised by the
bounty of the gods to a most flourishing position, both in population
and in military power, the Samnites defeated, the Sidicines and
Campanians in alliance with us, even the Volscians now making common
cause with us, whilst your own colonies actually prefer the government
of Latium to that of Rome. But since you cannot bring your minds to
abandon your impudent claims to sovereignty, we will go so far, in
recognising that we are kindred nations, as to offer peace upon the
conditions of equal rights for both, since it has pleased the gods to
grant equal strength to both; though we are quite able to assert the
independence of Latium by force of arms. One consul must be elected
from Rome, the other from Latium; the senate must contain an equal
number of members from both nations; there must be one nation, one
republic. And in order that there may be one seat of government and one
name for all, since one side or the other must make some concession,
let us, if this City really takes precedence, be all called Romans."
It so happened that the Romans had in their consul T. Manlius, a man
who was quite as proud and passionate as Annius. He was so enraged as
to declare that if the senate were visited by such madness as to accept
these conditions from a man from Setia, he would come with his sword
drawn
into the Senate-house and kill every Latin he found there. Then turning
to the image of Jupiter, he exclaimed: "Hear, O Jupiter, these
abominable words! Hear them, O Justice and Right! Thou, Jupiter, as
though thou hadst been conquered and made captive, art to see in thy
temple foreign consuls and a foreign senate! Were these the terms of
the treaty, Latins, which Tullus, the King of Rome, made with your
fathers of Alba, or which L. Tarquin made with you afterwards? Have you
forgotten the battle at Lake Regillus? Are you so utterly oblivious of
your defeats in the old days and of our kindness towards you?"
Ab urbe condita 8.6
This
outburst was followed by the indignant protest of the senate, and it is
recorded that whilst on all hands appeals were being made to the gods,
whom the consuls were continually invoking as the guardians of
treaties, the voice of Annius was heard pouring contempt upon the
divine majesty of the Jupiter of Rome. At all events when, in a storm
of passion he was flinging himself out of the vestibule of the temple,
he slipped down the steps and struck his head so heavily against the
bottom step that he became unconscious. The authorities are not agreed
as to whether he was actually killed, and I leave the question
undecided, as also the statement that during the appeals to the gods to
avenge the breach of treaties, a storm burst from the sky with a
terrific roar; for they may either be true or simply invented as an
appropriate representation of the wrath of the gods. Torquatus was sent
by the senate to conduct the envoys away and when he saw Annius lying
on the ground he exclaimed, loud enough to be heard by the senators and
populace alike: 'It is well. The gods have commenced a just and
righteous war! There is a divine power at work; thou, O Great Jupiter,
art here! Not in vain have we consecrated this to be shine abode, O
Father of gods and men! Why do you hesitate, Quirites, and you,
senators, to take up arms when the gods are your leaders? I will lay
the legions of the Latins low, just as you see their envoy lying here."
The consul's words were received by the people with loud applause and
raised them to such a pitch of excitement that when the envoys took
their departure they owed their safety more to the care of the
magistrates who, on the consul's order, accompanied them to protect
them from the attacks of the angry people than to any respect felt for
the law of nations.
War having been decided upon by senate as much as people, the consuls
enrolled two armies and proceeded through the territories of the Marsi
and Paeligni, where they were joined by an army of Samnites. They fixed
their camp at Capua, where the Latins and their allies had assembled.
It is said that whilst they were there each consul had the same vision
in the quiet of
the night. A Form greater and more awful than any human form appeared
to them and announced that the commander of the one army and the army
itself on the other side were destined as a sacrifice to the Dii Manes
and to Mother Earth. In whichever army the commander should have
devoted the legions of his enemies and himself as well to those
deities, that army, that people would have the victory. When the
consuls compared these visions of the night together, they decided that
victims should be slain to avert the wrath of the gods, and further,
that if, on inspection, they should portend the same as the vision had
announced, one of the two consuls should fulfil his destiny. When the
answers of the soothsayers after they had inspected the victims, proved
to correspond with their own secret belief in the vision, they called
up the superior officers and told them to explain publicly to the
soldiers what the gods had decreed, in order that the voluntary death
of a consul might not create a panic in the army. They arranged with
each other that when either division began to give way, the consul in
command of it should devote himself on behalf of the Roman people and
the Quirites." The council of war also decided that if ever any war had
been conducted with the strict enforcement of orders, on this occasion
certainly, military discipline should be brought back to the ancient
standard. Their anxiety was increased by the fact that it was against
the Latins that they had to fight, a people resembling them in
language, manners, arms, and especially in their military organisation.
They had been colleagues and comrades, as soldiers, centurions, and
tribunes, often stationed together in the same posts and side by side
in the same maniples. That this might not prove a source of error and
confusion, orders were given that no one was to leave his post to fight
with the enemy.
Ab urbe condita 8.7
Amongst the troop commanders, who had been sent out everywhere to
reconnoitre, there happened to be T. Manlius, the consul's son. He had
ridden out with his men by the enemy's camp and was hardly a stone's-
throw from their nearest post, where the Tusculan cavalry were
stationed, when Geminus Maecius, who was in command, a man of high
reputation amongst his own people, recognised the Roman cavalry and the
consul's son at their head, for they were all-especially the men of
distinction-known to each other. Accosting Manlius he said: "Are you
going to conduct the war against the Latins and their allies with that
single troop of yours?
What will the consuls, what will their two armies be doing in the
meantime?" "They will be here in good time, Manlius replied, "and so
will Jupiter, the Great and Powerful, the witness of your breach of
faith. If we fought at Lake Regillus till you had quite enough,
certainly we shall succeed here also in preventing you from finding too
much pleasure in meeting us in battle." In reply, Geminus rode forward
a short distance and said: "Are you willing, before the day comes when
you are to set your armies in motion for so great an effort, to have a
meeting with me that the result of our single combat may show how much
a Latin horseman is superior to a Roman?" Either urged on by anger or
feeling ashamed to decline the contest, or dragged on by the
irresistible power of destiny, the high-spirited youth forgot the
consul's edict and the obedience due to a father and rushed headlong
into a contest in which victory or defeat were alike fatal. The rest of
the cavalry retired to remain spectators of the fray; the two
combatants selected a clear space over which they charged each other at
full gallop with levelled spears. Manlius' lance passed above his
adversary's helmet, Maecius' across the neck of the other's horse. They
wheeled their horses round, and Manlius standing in his stirrups was
the first to get in a second stroke; he thrust his lance between the
horse's ears. Feeling the wound the horse reared, shook its head
violently, and threw its rider off. Whilst he was trying to rise after
his heavy fall by supporting himself with his lance and shield, Manlius
drove his lance right through his body and pinned him to the earth.
After despoiling the body he returned to his men, and amidst their
exulting shouts entered the camp and went straight to his father at the
headquarters' tent, not in the least realising the nature of his deed
or its possible consequences, whether praise or punishment. "That all
may say, my father," he said, "that I am a true scion of your blood, I
bring to you these equestrian spoils taken from a dead enemy who
challenged me to single combat." On hearing this the consul turned away
from his son and ordered the trumpet to sound the Assembly.
The soldiers mustered in large numbers and the consul began: "Since
you, T. Manlius, have shown no regard for either the authority of a
consul or the obedience due to a father, and in defiance of our edict
have left your post to fight against the enemy, and have done your best
to destroy the military discipline through which the Roman State has
stood till now unshaken, and have forced upon me the necessity of
forgetting either my duty to the republic or my duty to myself and my
children, it is better that we should suffer the consequences of our
offence ourselves than that the State should expiate our crime by
inflicting great injury upon itself. We shall be a
melancholy example, but one that will be profitable to the young men of
the future. My natural love of my children and that proof of courage
which from a false sense of honour you have given, move me to take your
part, but since either the consuls authority must be vindicated by your
death or for ever abrogated by letting you go unpunished, I would
believe that even you yourself, if there is a drop of my blood in your
veins, will not shrink from restoring by your punishment the military
discipline which has been weakened by your misconduct. Go, lictor, bind
him to the stake." All were paralysed by such a ruthless order; they
felt as if the axe was directed against each of them; fear rather than
discipline keep them motionless. For some moments they stood transfixed
in silence, then suddenly, when they saw the blood pouring from his
severed neck, their voices rose in unrestrained and angry complaint;
they spared neither laments nor curses. The body of the youth covered
with his spoils was cremated on a pyre erected outside the rampart,
with all the funeral honours that the soldiers' devotion could pay.
"Manlian orders" were not only regarded with horror for the time, but
were looked upon as setting a frightful precedent for the future.
Ab urbe condita 8.8
The terrible severity of the punishment, however, made the soldiers
more obedient to their general, and not only did it lead to greater
attention being paid to the pickets and sentry duties and the ordering
of the outposts, but when they went into battle for the final contest,
this severity proved to be of the greatest service. The battle was
exactly like one fought in a civil war; there was nothing in the Latin
army different from the Roman except their courage. At first the Romans
used the large round shield called the clipeus, afterwards, when the
soldiers received pay, the smaller oblong shield called the scutum was
adopted. phalanx formation,
similar to the Macedonian of the
earlier days, was abandoned in favour of the distribution into
companies (manipuli); the rear portion being broken up into smaller
divisions. The foremost line consisted of the hastati, formed into
fifteen companies, drawn up at a short distance from each other. These
were called the light-armed companies, as whilst one-third carried a
long spear (hasta) and short iron javelins, the remainder carried
shields. This front line consisted of youths in the first bloom of
manhood just old enough for service. Behind them were stationed an
equal number ofcompanies, called
principes, made up of men in the full vigour of life,
all carrying shields and furnished with superior weapons. This body of
thirty companies were called the antepilani. Behind them were the
standards under which were stationed fifteen companies, which were
divided into three sections called vexillae, the first section in each
was called the pilus, and they consisted of 180 men to every standard
(vexillum). The first vexillum was followed by the triarii, veterans of
proved courage; the second by the rorarii, or "skirmishers," younger
men and less distinguished; the third by the accensi, who were least to
be depended upon, and were therefore placed in the rearmost line.When the battle
formation of the army was completed, the hastati were
the first to engage. If they failed to repulse the enemy, they slowly
retired through the intervals between the companies of the principes
who then took up the fight, the hastati following in their rear. The
triarii, meantime, were resting on one knee under their standards,
their shields over their shoulders and their spears planted on the
ground with the points upwards, giving them the appearance of a
bristling palisade. If the principes were also unsuccessful, they
slowly retired to the triarii, which has given rise to the proverbial
saying, when people are in great difficulty "matters have come down to
the triarii." When the triarii had admitted the hastati and principes
through the intervals separating their companies they rose from their
kneeling posture and instantly closing their companies up they blocked
all passage through them and in one compact mass fell on the enemy as
the last hope of the army. The enemy who had followed up the others as
though they had defeated them, saw with dread a now and larger army
rising apparently out of the earth. There were generally four legions
enrolled, consisting each of 5000 men, and 300 cavalry were assigned to
each legion.
A force of equal size used to be supplied by the
Latins,
now, however, they were hostile to Rome. The two armies were drawn up
in the same formation, and they knew that if the maniples kept their
order they would have to fight, not only vexilla with vexilla, hastati
with hastati, principes with principes, but even centurion with
centurion. There were amongst the triarii two centurions, one in each
army-the Roman, possessing but little bodily strength but an energetic
and experienced soldier, the Latin, a man of enormous strength and a
splendid fighter-very well known to each other because they had always
served in the same company. The Roman, distrusting his own strength,
had obtained the consuls' permission before leaving Rome to choose his
own sub-centurion to protect him from the man who was destined to be
his enemy. This
youth, finding himself face to face with the Latin centurion, gained a
victory over him.
Ab urbe condita 8.9
The battle took place near the base of Mount Vesuvius, where the road
led to Veseris. Before leading out their armies to battle the consuls
offered sacrifice. The haruspex, whose duty it was to inspect the
different organs in the victims, pointed out to Decius a prophetic
intimation of his death, in all other respects the signs were
favourable. Manlius' sacrifice was entirely satisfactory. "It is well,"
said Decius, "if my colleague has obtained favourable signs." They
moved forward to battle in the formation I have already described,
Manlius in command of the right division, Decius of the left. At first
both armies fought with equal strength and equal determination. After a
time the Roman hastati on the left, unable to withstand the insistency
of the Latins, retired behind the principes. During the temporary
confusion created by this movement, Decius exclaimed in a loud voice to
M. Valerius:"Valerius, we need the help of the gods!
Let the Pontifex
Maximus dictate to me the words in which I am to devote myself for the
legions." The Pontifex bade him veil his head in his toga praetexta,
and rest his hand, covered with the toga, against his chin, then
standing upon a spear to say these words: "Janus, Jupiter, Father Mars,
Quirinus, Bellona, Lares, ye Novensiles and Indigetes, deities to whom
belongs the power over us and over our foes, and ye, too, Divine Manes,
I pray to you, I do you reverence, I crave your grace and favour that
you will bless the Roman People, the Quirites, with power and victory,
and visit the enemies of the Roman People, the Quirites, with fear and
dread and death. In like manner as I have uttered this prayer so do I
now on behalf of the commonwealth of the Quirites, on behalf of the
army, the legions, the auxiliaries of the Roman People, the Quirites,
devote the legions and auxiliaries of the enemy, together with myself
to the Divine Manes and to Earth." After this prayer he ordered the
lictors to go to T. Manlius and at once announce to his colleague that
he had devoted himself on behalf of the army. He then girded himself
with the Gabinian cincture, and in full armour leaped upon his horse
and dashed into the middle of the enemy.
To those who watched him in
both armies, he appeared something awful and superhuman, as though sent
from heaven to expiate and appease all the anger of the gods and to
avert destruction from his people and bring it on
their enemies. All the dread and terror which he carried with him threw
the front ranks of the Latins into confusion which soon spread
throughout the entire army. This was most evident, for wherever his
horse carried him they were paralysed as though struck by some
death-dealing star; but when he fell, overwhelmed with darts, the Latin
cohorts, in a state of perfect consternation, fled from the spot and
left a large space clear. The Romans, on the other hand, freed from all
religious fears, pressed forward as though the signal was then first
given and commenced a great battle. Even the rorarii rushed forward
between the companies of antepilani and added strength to the hastati
and principes, whilst the triarii, kneeling on their right knee, waited
for the consul's signal to rise
Ab urbe condita 8.10
When Manlius heard the fate of his colleague, he honoured his glorious
death with tears no less than with the due meed of praise. Meantime the
battle proceeded, and in some quarters the weight of numbers was giving
the advantage to the Latins. For some time Manlius was in doubt whether
the moment had not come for calling up the triarii, but judging it
better for them to be kept fresh till the final crisis of the battle,
he gave orders for the accensi at the extreme rear to advance to the
front. When they came up, the Latins, taking them for the opposing
triarii, instantly called up their own. In the desperate struggle they
had tired themselves out and broken or blunted their spears, but as
they were still driving the enemy back by main force, they imagined
that the battle was decided and that they had reached their last line.
Then it was that the consul said to his triarii: "Rise up now, fresh
and vigorous against a wearied foe; think of your country and your
parents and wives and children; think of your consul lying there dead
that ye might win the victory!" They rose up fresh and resplendent in
their armour, as though a new army had suddenly sprung up, and after
letting the antepilani retire through them they raised their
battle-shout. The front ranks of the Latins were thrown into disorder,
the Romans thrust their spears into their faces, and in this way killed
the main support of their army. They went on without being touched
through the remaining companies as though through a crowd of unarmed
men, and they marked their advance with such a slaughter that they left
hardly a fourth part of the enemy. The Samnites, too, who were drawn up
close to the lowest spurs of
the mountain, were threatening the Latins on their flank, and so adding
to their demoralisation.
The chief credit for that successful battle was given by all, Romans
and allies alike, to the two consuls-one of whom had diverted on to
himself alone all the dangers that threatened from the gods supernal
and the gods infernal, whilst the other had shown such consummate
generalship in the battle itself that the Roman and Latin historians
who have left an account of it, are quite agreed that whichever side
had had T. Manlius as their commander must have won the victory. After
their flight the Latins took refuge in Menturnae. Their camp was
captured after the battle, and many were killed there, mostly
Campanians. The body of Decius was not found that day, as night
overtook those who were searching for it, the next day it was
discovered, buried beneath a heap of javelins and with an immense
number of the enemy lying round it. His obsequies were conducted by his
colleague in a manner befitting that glorious death. I ought to add
here that a consul or Dictator or praetor, when he devotes the legions
of the enemy, need not necessarily devote himself but may select any
one he chooses out of a legion that has been regularly enrolled. If the
man who has been so devoted is killed, all is considered to have been
duly performed. If he is not killed, an image of the man, seven feet
high at least, must be buried in the earth, and a victim slain as an
expiatory sacrifice; on the spot, where such an image has been buried,
no Roman magistrate must ever set his foot. If, as in the case of
Decius, the commander devotes himself but survives the battle, he can
no longer discharge any religious function, either on his own account
or on behalf of the State. He has the right to devote his arms, either
by offering a sacrifice or otherwise, to Vulcan or to any other deity.
The spear on which the consul stands, when repeating the formula of
devotion, must not pass into the enemy's hands; should this happen a
suovetaurilia must be offered as a propitiation to Mars.
Ab urbe condita 8.11
Although the memory of every traditional custom relating to either
human or divine things has been lost through our abandonment of the old
religion of our fathers in favour of foreign novelties, I thought it
not alien from my subject to record these regulations in the very words
in which they have been handed down. In some authors I find it stated
that it was only after the battle was over that the Samnites who had
been waiting to see the
result came to support the Romans. Assistance was also coming to the
Latins from Lanuvium whilst time was being wasted in deliberation, but
whilst they were starting and a part of their column was already on the
march, news came of the defeat of the Latins. They faced about and re-
entered their city, and it is stated that Milionius, their praetor,
remarked that for that very short march they would have to pay a heavy
price to Rome. Those of the Latins who survived the battle retreated by
many different routes, and gradually assembled in the city of Vescia.
Here the leaders met to discuss the situation, and Numisius assured
them that both armies had really experienced the same fortune and an
equal amount of bloodshed; the Romans enjoyed no more than the name of
victory, in every other respect they were as good as defeated. The
headquarters of both consuls were polluted with blood; the one had
murdered his son, the other had devoted himself to death; their whole
army was massacred, their hastati and principes killed; the companies
both in front of and behind the standards had suffered enormous losses;
the triarii in the end saved the situation. The Latin troops, it was
true, were equally cut up, but Latium and the Volsci could supply
reinforcements more quickly than Rome. If, therefore, they approved, he
would at once call out the fighting men from the Latin and Volscian
peoples and march back with an army to Capua, and would take the Romans
unawares; a battle was the last thing they were expecting. He
despatched misleading letters throughout Latium and the Volscian
country, those who had not been engaged in the battle being the more
ready to believe what he said, and a hastily levied body of militia,
drawn from all quarters, was got together. This army was met by the
consul at Trifanum, a place between Sinuessa and Menturnae. Without
waiting even to choose the sites for their camps, the two armies piled
their baggage, fought and finished the war, for the Latins were so
utterly worsted that when the consul with his victorious army was
preparing to ravage their territory, they made a complete surrender and
the Campanians followed their example. Latium and Capua were deprived
of their territory. The Latin territory, including that of Privernum,
together with the Falernian, which had belonged to the Campanians as
far as the Volturnus, was distributed amongst the Roman plebs. They
received two jugera a head in the Latin territory, their allotment
being made up by three-quarters of a jugerum in the Privernate
district; in the Falernian district they received three entire jugera,
the additional quarter being allowed owing to the distance. The
Laurentes, amongst the Latins and the aristocracy of the Campanians,
were not thus penalised because they had not revolted. An order was
made for the treaty with the Laurentes to be renewed, and it has
since been renewed annually on the tenth day after the Latin Festival.
The Roman franchise was conferred on the aristocracy of Campania, and a
brazen tablet recording the fact was fastened up in Rome in the temple
of Castor, and the people of Campania were ordered to pay them
each-they numbered 1600 in all-the sum of 450 denarii annually.
Ab urbe condita 8.12
The war having been thus brought to a close, and rewards and
punishments having been meted out to each according to their deserts,
T. Manlius returned to Rome. There seems good reason for believing that
only the older men went out to meet him on his arrival, the younger
part of the population showed their aversion and detestation for him
not only then but all through his life. The Antiates made incursions
into the territories of Ostia, Ardea, and Solonia. Manlius' health
prevented him from prosecuting this war, so he nominated L. Papirius
Crassus as Dictator, and he named L. Papirius Cursor as his Master of
the Horse. No important action was taken by the Dictator against the
Antiates, though he had a permanent camp in their country for some
months. This year had been signalised by victories over many powerful
nations, and still more by the noble death of one consul, and the
stern, never-to-be-forgotten exercise of authority on the part of the
other. It was followed by the consulship of Titus Aemilius Mamercinus
and Q. Publilius Philo. They did not meet with similar materials out of
which to build a reputation, nor did they study the interests of their
country so much as their own or those of the political factions in the
republic. The Latins resumed hostilities to recover the domain they had
lost, but were routed in the Fenectane plains and driven out of their
camp. There Publilius, who had achieved this success, received into
surrender the Latin cities who had lost their men there, whilst
Aemilius led his army to Pedum. This place was defended by a combined
force from Tibur, Praeneste, and Velitrae, and help was also sent from
Lanuvium and Antium. In the various battles the Romans had the
advantage, but at the city itself, and at the camp of the allied forces
which adjoined the city, their work had to be done all over again. The
consul suddenly abandoned the war before it was brought to a close,
because he heard that a triumph had been decreed to his colleague, and
he actually returned to Rome to demand a triumph before he had won a
victory. The senate were disgusted at this selfish conduct, and made
him understand
that he would have no triumph till Pedum had either been taken or
surrendered. This produced a complete estrangement between Aemilius and
the senate, and he thenceforth administered his consulship in the
spirit and temper of a seditious tribune. As long as he was consul he
perpetually traduced the senate to the people, without any opposition
from his colleague, who himself also belonged to the plebs. Material
for his charges was afforded by the dishonest allocation of the Latin
and Falernian domain amongst the plebs, and after the senate, desirous
of restricting the consuls' authority, had issued an order for the
nomination of a Dictator to act against the Latins, Aemilius, whose
turn it then was to have the fasces, nominated his own colleague, who
named Junius Brutus as his Master of the Horse. He made his
Dictatorship popular by delivering incriminatory harangues against the
senate and also by carrying three measures which were directed against
the nobility and were most advantageous to the plebs. One was that the
decisions of the plebs should be binding on all the Quirites; the
second, that measures which were brought before the Assembly of
centuries should be sanctioned by the patricians before being finally
put to the vote; the third, that since it had come about that both
censors could legally be appointed from the plebs, one should in any
case be always chosen from that order. The patricians considered that
the consuls and the Dictator had done more to injure the State by their
domestic policy than to strengthen its power by their successes in the
field.
Ab urbe condita 8.13
The consuls for the next year were L. Furius Camillus and C. Maenius.
In order to bring more discredit upon Aemilius for his neglect of his
military duties the previous year, the senate insisted that no
expenditure of arms and men must be spared in order to reduce and
destroy Pedum. The new consuls were peremptorily ordered to lay aside
everything else and march at once. The state of affairs in Latium was
such that they would neither maintain peace nor undertake war. For war
their resources were utterly inadequate, and they were smarting too
keenly under the loss of their territory to think of peace. They
decided, therefore, on a middle course, namely, to confine themselves
to their towns, and if they were informed of any town being attacked,
to send assistance to it from the whole of Latium. The people of Tibur
and Praeneste, who were the nearest, reached Pedum, but the troops from
Aricium, Lanuvium, and Veliternae, in conjunction
with the Volscians of Antium, were suddenly attacked and routed by
Maenius at the river Astura. Camillus engaged the Tiburtines who were
much the strongest force, and, though with greater difficulty, achieved
a similar success. During the battle the townsmen made a sudden sortie,
but Camillus, directing a part of his army against them, not only drove
them back within their walls, but stormed and captured the town, after
routing the troops sent to their assistance, all in one day. After this
successful attack on one city, they decided to make a greater and
bolder effort and to lead their victorious army on to the complete
subjugation of Latium. They did not rest until, by capturing or
accepting the surrender of one city after another, they had effected
their purpose. Garrisons were placed in the captured towns, after which
they returned to Rome to enjoy a triumph which was by universal consent
accorded to them. An additional honour was paid to the two consuls in
the erection of their equestrian statues in the Forum, a rare incident
in that age.
Before the consular elections for the following year were held,
Camillus brought before the senate the question of the future
settlement of Latium. "Senators," he said, "our military operations in
Latium have by the gracious favour of the gods and the bravery of our
troops been brought to successful close. The hostile armies were cut
down at Pedum and the Astura, all the Latin towns and the Volscian
Antium have either been stormed or have surrendered and are now held by
your garrisons. We are growing weary of their constant renewal of
hostilities, it is for you to consult as to the best means of binding
them to a perpetual peace. The immortal gods have made you so
completely masters of the situation that they have put it into your
hands to decide whether there shall be hence- forth a Latium or not. So
far, then, as the Latins are concerned, you can secure for yourselves a
lasting peace by either cruelty or kindness. Do you wish to adopt
ruthless measures against a people that have surrendered and been
defeated? It is open to you to wipe out the whole Latin nation and
create desolation and solitude in that country which has furnished you
with a splendid army of allies which you have employed in many great
wars. Or do you wish to follow the example of your ancestors and make
Rome greater by conferring her citizenship on those whom she has
defeated? The materials for her expansion to a glorious height are here
at hand. That is assuredly the most firmly-based empire, whose subjects
take a delight in rendering it their obedience. But whatever decision
you come to, you must make haste about it. You are keeping so many
peoples in suspense, with their minds distracted between hope and fear,
that you are bound to relieve
yourselves as soon as possible from your anxiety about them, and by
exercising either punishment or kindness to pre-occupy minds which a
state of strained expectancy has deprived of the power of thought. Our
task has been to put you in a position to take the whole question into
consultation, your task is to decree what is best for yourselves and
for the republic."
Ab urbe condita 8.14
The leaders of the senate applauded the way in which the consul had
introduced the motion, but as the circumstances differed in different
cases they thought that each case ought to be decided upon its merits,
and with the view of facilitating discussion they requested the consul
to put the name of each place separately. Lanuvium received the full
citizenship and the restitution of her sacred things, with the proviso
that the temple and grove of Juno Sospita should belong in common to
the Roman people and the citizens living at Lanuvium. Aricium,
Nomentum, and Pedum obtained the same political rights as Lanuvium.
Tusculum retained the citizenship which it had had before, and the
responsibility for the part it took in the war was removed from the
State as a whole and fastened on a few individuals. The Veliternians,
who had been Roman citizens from old times, were in consequence of
their numerous revolts severely dealt with; their walls were thrown
down, their senate deported and ordered to live on the other side of
the Tiber; if any of them were caught on this side of the river, he was
to be fined 1000 ases, and the man who caught him was not to release
him from confinement till the money was paid. Colonists were sent on to
the land they had possessed, and their numbers made Velitrae look as
populous as formerly. Antium also was assigned to a fresh body of
colonists, but the Antiates were permitted to enrol themselves as
colonists if they chose; their warships were taken away, and they were
forbidden to possess any more; they were admitted to citizenship. Tibur
and Praeneste had their domains confiscated, not owing to the part
which they, in common with the rest of Latium, had taken in the war,
but because, jealous of the Roman power, they had joined arms with the
barbarous nation of the Gauls. The rest of the Latin cities were
deprived of the rights of intermarriage, free trade, and common
councils with each other. Capua, as a reward for the refusal of its
aristocracy to join the Latins, were allowed to enjoy the private
rights of Roman citizens, as were also Fundi and
Formiae, because they had always allowed a free passage through their
territory. It was decided that Cumae and Suessula should enjoy the same
rights as Capua. Some of the ships of Antium were taken into the Roman
docks, others were burnt and their beaks (rostra) were fastened on the
front of a raised gallery which was constructed at the end of the
Forum, and which from this circumstance was called the Rostra.
Ab urbe condita 8.15
C. Sulpicius Longus and P. Aelius Paetus were the new consuls. The
blessings of peace were now enjoyed everywhere, a peace maintained not
more by the power of Rome than by the influence she had acquired
through her considerate treatment of her vanquished enemies, when a war
broke out between the Sidicines and the Auruncans. After their
surrender had been accepted by the consul Manlius, the Auruncans had
kept quiet, which gave them a stronger claim to the help of Rome. The
senate decided that assistance should be afforded them, but before the
consuls started, a report was brought that the Auruncans had been
afraid to remain in their town and had fled with their wives and
children to Suessa-now called Aurunca-which they had fortified, and
that their city with its ancient walls had been destroyed by the
Sidicines. The senate were angry with the consuls, through whose delay
their allies had been betrayed, and ordered a Dictator to be nominated.
C. Claudius Regillensis was nominated accordingly, and he named as his
Master of the Horse C. Claudius Hortator. There was some difficulty
about the religious sanction of the Dictator's appointment, and as the
augurs pronounced that there was an irregularity in his election, both
the Dictator and the Master of the Horse resigned. This year Minucia, a
Vestal, incurred suspicion through an improper love of dress, and
subsequently was accused of unchastity on the evidence of a slave. She
had received orders from the pontiffs to take no part in the sacred
rights and not to manumit any of her slaves. She was tried and found
guilty, and was buried alive near the Colline Gate to the right of the
high road in the Campus Sceleratus (the "accursed field"), which, I
believe, derives its name from this incident. In this year also Q.
Publilius Philo was elected as the first plebeian praetor against the
opposition of the consul Sulpicius; the senate, after failing to keep
the highest posts in their own hands, showed less interest in retaining
the praetorship.
Ab urbe condita 8.16
The consuls for the following year were L. Papirius Crassus and Caeso
Duillius. There was war with the Ausonians; the fact that it was
against a new enemy rather than a formidable one made it noticeable.
This people inhabited the city of Cales, and had joined arms with their
neighbours, the Sidicines. The combined army of the two cities was
routed in a quite insignificant engagement; the proximity of their
cities made them all the sooner seek a safety in flight which they did
not find in fighting. The senate were none the less anxious about the
war, in view of the fact that the Sidicines had so frequently either
taken the aggressive themselves or assisted others to do so, or had
been the cause of hostilities. They did their utmost, therefore, to
secure the election of M. Valerius Corvus, the greatest commander of
his day, as consul for the fourth time. M. Atilius Regulus was assigned
to him as his colleague. To avoid any chance of mistake, the consuls
requested that this war might be assigned to Corvus without deciding it
by lot. After taking over the victorious army from the previous
consuls, he marched to Cales, where the war had originated. The enemy
were dispirited through the remembrance of the former conflict, and he
routed them at the very first attack. He then advanced to an assault
upon their walls. Such was the eagerness of the soldiers that they were
anxious to bring up the scaling ladders and mount the walls forthwith,
but Corvus perceived the difficulty of the task and preferred to gain
his object by submitting his men to the labours of a regular siege
rather than by exposing them to unnecessary risks. So he constructed an
agger and brought up the vineae and the turrets close to the walls, but
a fortunate circumstance rendered them unnecessary. M. Fabius, a Roman
prisoner, succeeded in eluding his guards on a festival, and after
breaking his chains fastened a rope from a battlement of the wall and
let himself down amongst the Roman works. He induced the commander to
attack the enemy while they were sleeping off the effects of their wine
and feasting, and the Ausonians were captured, together with their
city, with no more trouble than they had previously been routed in the
open field. The booty seized was enormous, and after a garrison was
placed in Cales the legions were marched back to Rome. The senate
passed a resolution allowing the consul to celebrate a triumph, and in
order that Atilius might have a chance of distinguishing himself, both
the consuls were ordered to march against the Sidicines. Before
starting they nominated, on the resolution of the
senate, L. Aemilius Mamercinus as Dictator, for the purpose of
conducting the elections; he named Q. Publilius Philo as his Master of
the Horse. The consuls elected were T. Veturius and Spurius Postumius.
Although there was still war with the Sidicines, they brought forward a
proposal to send a colony to Cales in order to anticipate the wishes of
the plebs by a voluntary act of kindness. The senate passed a
resolution that 2500 names should be enrolled, and the three
commissioners appointed to settle the colonists and allocate the
holdings were Caeso Duillius, T. Quinctius, and M. Fabius.
Ab urbe condita 8.17
The new consuls, after taking over the army from their predecessors,
entered the enemy's territory and carried their depredations up to the
walls of their city. The Sidicines had got together an immense army,
and were evidently prepared to fight desperately for their last hope;
there was also a report that Samnium was being roused into hostilities.
A Dictator was accordingly nominated by the consuls on the resolution
of the senate-P. Cornelius Rufinus; the Master of the Horse was M.
Antonius. Subsequently a religious difficulty arose through an
informality in their nomination, and they resigned their posts. In
consequence of a pestilence which followed, it seemed as though all the
auspices were tainted by that informality, and matters reverted to an
interregnum. There were five interreges and under the last one, M.
Valerius Corvus, the consuls elected were C. Cornelius (for the second
time) and Cn. Domitius. Matters were now quiet, but a rumour of a
Gaulish war created as much alarm as an actual invasion, and it was
decided that a Dictator should be appointed. M. Papirius Crassus was
nominated, his Master of the Horse being P. Valerius Publicola. Whilst
they were raising a stronger levy than was usual in wars near at hand,
the reconnoitring parties that had been sent out reported that all was
quiet amongst the Gauls. For the last two years there had been
suspicions of a movement in Samnium in favour of a change of policy,
and as a measure of precaution the Roman army was not withdrawn from
the Sidicine territory. The landing of Alexander of Epirus near Paestum
led the Samnites to make common cause with the Lucanians, but their
united forces were defeated by turn in a pitched battle. He then
established friendly relations with Rome, but it is very doubtful how
far he would have maintained them had his other enterprises been
equally successful. In
this year a census was taken, the censors being Q. Publilius Philo and
Sp. Postumius. The new citizens were assessed and formed into two
additional tribes, the Maecian and the Scaptian. L. Papirius, the
praetor, secured the passage of a law by which the rights of
citizenship without the franchise were conferred on the inhabitants of
Acerrae. These were the military and civil transactions for the year.
Ab urbe condita 8.18
M. Claudius Marcellus and T. Valerius were the new consuls. I find in
the annals Flaccus and Potitus variously given as the consul's
cognomen, but the question is of small importance. This year gained an
evil notoriety, either through the unhealthy weather or through human
guilt. I would gladly believe-and the authorities are not unanimous on
the point-that it is a false story which states that those whose deaths
made the year notorious for pestilence were really carried off by
poison. I shall, however, relate the matter as it has been handed down
to avoid any appearance of impugning the credit of our authorities. The
foremost men in the State were being attacked by the same malady, and
in almost every case with the same fatal results. A maid-servant went
to Q. Fabius Maximus, one of the curule aediles, and promised to reveal
the cause of the public mischief if the government would guarantee her
against any danger in which her discovery might involve her. Fabius at
once brought the matter to the notice of the consuls and they referred
it to the senate, who authorised the promise of immunity to be given.
She then disclosed the fact that the State was suffering through the
crimes of certain women; those poisons were concocted by Roman matrons,
and if they would follow her at once she promised that they should
catch the poisoners in the act. They followed their informant and
actually found some women compounding poisonous drugs and some poisons
already made up. These latter were brought into the Forum, and as many
as twenty matrons, at whose houses they had been seized, were brought
up by the magistrates' officers. Two of them, Cornelia and Sergia, both
members of patrician houses, contended that the drugs were medicinal
preparations. The maid-servant, when confronted with them, told them to
drink some that they might prove she had given false evidence. They
were allowed time to consult as to what they would do, and the
bystanders were ordered to retire that they might take counsel with the
other matrons. They all consented to drink the drugs, and after doing so
fell victims to their own criminal designs. Their attendants were
instantly arrested, and denounced a large number of matrons as being
guilty of the same offence, out of whom a hundred and seventy were
found guilty. Up to that time there had never been a charge of poison
investigated in Rome. The whole incident was regarded as a portent, and
thought to be an act of madness rather than deliberate wickedness. In
consequence of the universal alarm created, it was decided to follow
the precedent recorded in the annals. During the secessions of the
plebs in the old days a nail had been driven in by the Dictator, and by
this act of expiation men's minds, disordered by civil strife, had been
restored to sanity. A resolution was passed accordingly, that a
Dictator should be appointed to drive in the nail. Cnaeus Quinctilius
was appointed and named L. Valerius as his Master of the Horse. After
the nail was driven in they resigned office.
Ab urbe condita 8.19
L. Papirius Crassus and L. Plautius Venox were thereupon elected
consuls, the former for the second time. At the beginning of the year
deputations came from Fabrateria and Luca, places belonging to the
Volscians, with a request to be received into the protection of Rome,
whose overlordship they would faithfully and loyally acknowledge if
they would undertake to defend them from the Samnites. The senate
acceded to their request, and sent to warn the Samnites against
violating the territory of these two cities. The Samnites took the
warning, not because they were anxious for peace, but because they were
not yet ready for war. This year a war commenced with Privernum and its
ally, Fundi; their commander was a Fundan, Vitrubius Baccus, a man of
great distinction not only in his own city but even in Rome, where he
had a house on the Palatine, which was afterwards destroyed and the
site sold, the place being thenceforth known as the Bacci Prata. Whilst
he was spreading devastation far and wide through the districts of
Setia, Norba, and Cora, L. Papirius advanced against him and took up a
position not far from his camp. Vitrubius had neither the prudence to
remain within his lines in presence of an enemy stronger than himself
nor the courage to fight at a distance from his camp. He gave battle
whilst his men were hardly clear of their camp, and thinking more of
retreating back to it than of the battle or the enemy, was with very
little effort put to a decisive defeat. Owing to the proximity of the
camp retreat was easy, and he had not much difficulty in protecting his
men from
serious loss; hardly any were killed in the actual battle, and only a
few in the rear of the crowded fugitives as they were rushing into
their camp. As soon as it grew dark they abandoned it for Privernum,
trusting to stone walls for protection rather than to the rampart round
their camp.
The other consul, Plautius, after ravaging the fields in all directions
and carrying off the plunder, led his army into the territory of Fundi.
As he was crossing their frontier the senate of Fundi met him and
explained that they had not come to intercede for Vitrubius and those
who had belonged to his party, but for the people of Fundi. They
pointed out that Vitrubius himself had cleared them from all
responsibility by seeking shelter in Privernum and not in Fundi, though
it was his city. At Privernum, therefore, the enemies of Rome were to
be looked for and punished, for they had been faithless both to Fundi
and Rome. The men of Fundi wished for peace; their sympathies were
wholly Roman, and they retained a grateful sense of the boon they
received when the rights of citizenship were conferred upon them. They
besought the consul to abstain from making war upon an unoffending
people; their lands, their city, their own persons and the persons of
their wives and children were and would continue to be at the disposal
of Rome. The consul commended them for their loyalty and sent
despatches to Rome to inform the senate that the Fundans were firm in
their allegiance, after which he marched to Privernum. Claudius gives a
different account. According to him the consul first proceeded against
the ringleaders of the revolt, of whom three hundred and fifty were
sent in chains to Rome. He adds that the senate refused to receive the
surrender because they considered that the Fundans were anxious to
escape with the punishment of poor and obscure individuals.
Ab urbe condita 8.20
Whilst Privernum was invested by two consular armies, one of the
consuls was recalled home to conduct the elections. It was in this year
that the carceres were erected in the Circus Maximus. The trouble of
the war with Privernum was not yet over when a most alarming report of
a sudden movement amongst the Gauls reached the senate. Such reports
were not often treated lightly. The new consuls, L. Aemilius Mamercinus
and C Plautius, were immediately ordered to arrange their respective
commands on the very day they assumed office, namely July 1. The
Gaulish war fell to Mamercinus, and he allowed none of those who were
called up for
service to claim exemption. It is even asserted that the mob of
mechanics and artizans, a class utterly unfit for warfare, were called
out. An immense army was concentrated at Veii to check the advance of
the Gauls. It was thought better not to march any further in case the
enemy took some other route to the City. After a thorough
reconnaissance had been made, it was ascertained after a few days that
all was quiet as far as the Gauls were concerned, and the whole force
was thereupon marched to Privernum. From this point there is a twofold
story. Some state that the city was stormed and Vitrubius taken alive;
other authorities aver that before the final assault the townsmen came
out with a caduceus and surrendered to the consul, whilst Vitrubius was
given up by his own men. The senate, when consulted as to the fate of
Vitrubius and the Privernates, instructed the consul to demolish the
walls of Privernum and station a strong garrison there, and then to
celebrate his triumph. Vitrubius was to be kept in prison until the
consul returned and then to be scourged and beheaded; his house on the
Palatine was to be razed and his goods devoted to Semo Sancus. The
money realised by their sale was melted down into brazen orbs which
were deposited in the chapel of Sancus opposite the temple of Quirinus.
With regard to the senate of Privernum, it was decreed that every
senator who had remained in that city after its revolt from Rome should
be deported beyond the Tiber on the same conditions as those of
Velitrae. After his triumph, when Vitrubius and his accomplices had
been put to death, the consul thought that as the senate was satisfied
with the punishment of the guilty, he might safely refer to the matter
of the Privernates. He addressed the House in the following terms:
"Since the authors of the revolt, senators, have been visited by the
immortal gods and by you with the punishment they deserved, what is
your pleasure with regard to the innocent population? Although it is my
duty to ask for opinions rather than to give them, I should like to say
that in view of the fact that the Privernates are neighbours of the
Samnites, with whom peaceful relations are now upon a most uncertain
footing, I am anxious that as few grounds of complaint as possible
should exist between us and them."
Ab urbe condita 8.21
The question was not an easy one to settle, for the senators, were
governed largely by their temperaments and some advised a harsh, others
a gentler course. The general divergence of opinion was widened by one
of the Privernate envoys who was thinking more of the state of things
in which he had been born than of his present plight. One of the
senators who was advocating sterner measures asked him what punishment
he thought his
countrymen deserved. He replied: "The punishment which those deserve
who assert their liberty." The consul saw that this spirited reply only
exasperated those who were already adverse to the cause of the
Privernates, and he tried to get a softer answer by a more considerate
question. "Well," he said, "if we spare you now, what sort of a peace
may we hope to have with you for the time to come?" "A real and lasting
one," was the reply, "if its terms be good, but if they are bad, one
that will soon be broken." On hearing this, some of the senators
exclaimed that he was using open threats, and that it was by such
language that even those states which had been pacified were incited to
renew hostilities. The better part of the senate, however, put a more
favourable construction on his reply, and declared that it was an
utterance worthy of a man and a man who loved liberty. Was it, they
asked, to be supposed that any people or for that matter, any
individual would remain longer than he could help under conditions
which made him discontented? Peace would only be faithfully kept where
those who accepted it did so voluntarily; they could not hope that it
would be faithfully kept where they sought to reduce men to servitude.
The senate was brought to adopt this view mainly by the consul himself
who kept repeating to the consulars-the men who had to state their
opinions first-in a tone loud enough for many to hear, "Men whose first
and last thought is their liberty deserve to become Romans." Thus they
gained their cause in the senate, and the proposal to confer full
citizenship on the Privernates was submitted to the people.
Ab urbe condita 8.22
The new consuls were P. Plautius Proculus and P Cornelius Scapula. The
year was not remarkable for anything at home or abroad beyond the fact
that a colony was sent to Fregellae which was in the territory of
Sidicum and had afterwards belonged to the Volscians. There was also a
distribution of meat made to the people by M. Flavius on the occasion
of his mother's funeral. There were many who looked upon this as the
payment of a bribe to the people under the pretext of honouring his
mother's memory. He had been prosecuted by the aediles on the charge of
seducing a married woman, and had been acquitted, and this was
considered in the light of a dole given in return for the favour shown
him at the trial. It proved also to be the means of his gaining office,
for at the next election he was made a tribune of the plebs in his
absence and over
the heads of competitors who had personally canvassed. Palaeopolis was
a city not far from the present site of Neapolis. The two cities formed
one community. The original inhabitants came from Cumae; Cumae traced
its origin to Chalcis in Euboea. The fleet in which they had sailed
from home gave them the mastery of the coastal district which they now
occupy, and after landing in the islands of Aenaria and Pithecusae they
ventured to transfer their settlements to the mainland. This community,
relying on their own strength and on the lax observance of treaty
obligations which the Samnites were showing towards the Romans, or
possibly trusting to the effect of the pestilence which they had heard
was now attacking the City, committed many acts of aggression against
the Romans who were living in Campania and the Falernian country. In
consequence of this, the consuls, L. Cornelius Lentulus and Q.
Publilius Philo, sent the fetials to Palaeopolis to demand redress. On
hearing that the Greeks, a people valiant in words rather than in
deeds, had sent a defiant reply, the people, with the sanction of the
senate, ordered war to be made on Palaeopolis. The consuls arranged
their respective commands; the Greeks were left for Publilius to deal
with; Cornelius, with a second army, was to check any movement on the
part of the Samnites. As, however, he received intelligence that they
intended to advance into Campania in anticipation of a rising there, he
thought it best to form a standing camp there.
Ab urbe condita 8.23
Both consuls sent word to the senate that there were very slender hopes
of the Samnites remaining at peace. Publilius informed them that 2000
troops from Nola and 4000 Samnites had been admitted into Palaeopolis,
more under pressure from Nola than from any great desire for their
presence on the part of the Greeks; Cornelius sent the additional
information that orders for a general levy had been issued throughout
Samnium, and attempts were being openly made to induce the neighbouring
communities of Privernum, Fundi, and Formiae to rise. Under these
circumstances it was decided to send ambassadors to the Samnites before
actually commencing war. The Samnites sent an insolent reply. They
accused the Romans of wanton aggression, and absolutely denied the
charges made against themselves; they declared that the assistance
which the Greeks had received was not furnished by their government,
nor had they tampered with Fundi and Formiae, for they had no reason to
distrust their own
strength if it came to war. Moreover, it was impossible to disguise the
deep irritation which the Samnite nation felt at the conduct of the
Roman people in restoring Fregellae after they had taken it from the
Volscians and destroyed it, and placing a colony on Samnite territory
which the colonists called Fregellae. If this insult and injury were
not removed by those responsible for it, they would themselves exert
all their strength to get rid of it. The Roman ambassadors invited them
to submit the questions at issue to arbitration before their common
friends, but the Samnites replied: "Why should we beat about the bush?
No diplomacy, no arbitration can adjust our quarrel; arms and the
fortune of war can alone decide the issue. We must meet in Campania."
To which the Roman replied: "Roman soldiers will march not whither the
enemy summons them, but whither their commander leads them."
Publilius meantime had taken up a suitable position between Palaeopolis
and Neapolis in order to prevent them from rendering each other the
mutual assistance they had hitherto given. The time for the elections
was close at hand, and it would have been most inexpedient for the
public interest to recall Publilius, as he was ready to attack the
place and in daily expectation of effecting its capture. An arrangement
was accordingly made with the tribunes of the plebs to propose to the
people that at the expiration of his term of office Publilius should
continue to act as proconsul till the war with the Greeks was brought
to a close. The same step was taken with regard to Cornelius, who had
already entered Samnium, and written instructions were sent to him to
nominate a Dictator to hold the elections. He nominated M. Claudius
Marcellus, and Sp. Postumius was named by him Master of the Horse. The
elections, however, were not held by that Dictator, doubts having been
raised as to whether the proper formalities had been observed in his
nomination. The augurs, when consulted, declared that they had not been
duly observed. The tribunes characterised their action as dishonest and
iniquitous. "How," they asked, "could they know that there was any
irregularity? The consul rose at midnight to nominate the Dictator; he
had made no communication to any one either officially or privately
about the matter; there was no one living who could say that he had
seen or heard anything which would vitiate the auspices; the augurs
sitting quietly in Rome could not possibly divine what difficulty the
consul may have met with in the camp. Who was there who could not see
that the irregularity which the augurs had discovered lay in the fact
that the Dictator was a plebeian?" These and other objections were
raised by the tribunes. Matters, however, reverted to an interregnum,
and owing to
the repeated adjournment of the elections on one pretext after another,
there were no fewer than fourteen interregna. At last L. Aemilius, the
fourteenth interrex, declared C. Poetilius and L. Papirius Mugilanus
duly elected. In other lists I find Cursor.
Ab urbe condita 8.24
The foundation of Alexandria in Egypt is stated to have taken place
this year (327 B.C.), and also the assassination of Alexander of Epirus
at the hands of a Lucanian refugee, an event which fulfilled the
oracular prediction of the Dodonean Jupiter. When he was invited by the
Tarentines into Italy, he received a warning to beware of the water of
Acheron and the city of Pandosia; for it was there that the limits of
his destiny were fixed. This made him cross over into Italy all the
sooner, that he might be as far as possible from the city of Pandosia
in Epirus and the river Acheron, which flows from Molossis into the
Infernal Marshes and finally empties itself into the Thesprotian Gulf.
But, as often happens, in trying to avoid his fate he rushed upon it.
He won many victories over the nationalities of Southern Italy,
inflicting numerous defeats upon the legions of Bruttium and Lucania,
capturing the city of Heraclea, a colony of settlers from Tarentum,
taking Potentia from the Lucanians, Sipontum from the Apulians,
Consentia and Terina from the Bruttii and other cities belonging to the
Messapians and Lucanians. He sent three hundred noble families to
Epirus to be detained there as hostages. The circumstances under which
he met his death were these. He had taken up a permanent position on
three hills not far from the city of Pandosia which is close to the
frontiers of the Lucanians and Bruttii. From this point he made
incursions into every part of the enemy's territory, and on these
expeditions he had as a bodyguard some two hundred Lucanian refugees,
in whose fidelity he placed confidence, but who, like most of their
countrymen, were given to changing their minds as their fortunes
changed. Continuous rains had inundated the whole country and prevented
the three divisions of the army from mutually supporting each other,
the level ground between the hills being impassable. While they were in
this condition two out of the three divisions were suddenly attacked in
the king's absence and overwhelmed. After annihilating them the enemy
invested the third hill, where the king was present in person. The
Lucanian refugees managed to communicate with their countrymen, and
promised, if a safe return were guaranteed to
them, to place the king in their hands alive or dead. Alexander, with a
picked body of troops, cut his way, with splendid courage, through the
enemy, and meeting the Lucanian general slew him after a hand to hand
fight. Then getting together those of his men who were scattered in
flight, he rode towards the ruins of a bridge which had been carried
away by the floods and came to a river. Whilst his men were fording it
with very uncertain footing, a soldier, almost spent by his exertions
and his fears, cursed the river for its unlucky name, and said,
"Rightly art thou called Acheros!" When these words fell on his ear the
king at once recalled to mind the oracular warning, and stopped,
doubtful whether to cross or not. Sotimus, one of his personal
attendants, asked him why he hesitated at such a critical moment and
drew his attention to the suspicious movements of the Lucanian refugees
who were evidently meditating treachery. The king looked back and saw
them coming on in a compact body; he at once drew his sword and spurred
his horse through the middle of the river. He had already reached the
shallow water on the other side when one of the refugees some distance
away transfixed him with a javelin. He fell from his horse, and his
lifeless body with the weapon sticking in it was carried down by the
current to that part of the bank where the enemy were stationed. There
it was horribly mutilated. After cutting it through the middle they
sent one half to Consentia and kept the other to make sport of. Whilst
they were pelting it at a distance with darts and stones a solitary
woman ventured among the rabble who were showing such incredible
brutality and implored them to desist. She told them amid her tears
that her husband and children were held prisoners by the enemy and she
hoped to ransom them with the king's body however much it might have
been disfigured. This put an end to the outrages. What was left of the
limbs was cremated at Consentia by the reverential care of this one
woman, and the bones were sent back to Metapontum; from there they were
carried to Cleopatra, the king's wife, and Olympias, his sister, the
latter of whom was the mother, the former the sister of Alexander the
Great. I thought it well to give this brief account of the tragic end
of Alexander of Epirus, for although Fortune kept him from hostilities
with Rome, the wars he waged in Italy entitle him to a place in this
history.
Ab urbe condita 8.25
A laetisternium took place this year (326 B.C.), the fifth since the
foundation of the City, and the same deities were propitiated in this
as in the former one. The new consuls, acting on the orders of the
people, sent heralds to deliver a formal declaration of war to the
Samnites, and made all their preparations on a much greater scale for
this war than for the one against the Greeks. New and unexpected
succours were forthcoming, for the Lucanians and Apulians, with whom
Rome had up to that time established no relations, came forward with
offers to make an alliance and promised armed assistance; a friendly
alliance was formed with them. Meantime the operations in Samnium were
attended with success, the towns of Allifae, Callifae, and Rufrium
passed into the hands of the Romans, and ever since the consuls had
entered the country the rest of the territory was ravaged far and wide.
Whilst this war was commencing thus favourably, the other war against
the Greeks was approaching its close. Not only were the two towns
Palaeopolis and Neapolis cut off from all communication with each other
by the enemy's lines, but the townsfolk within the walls were
practically prisoners to their own defenders, and were suffering more
from them than from anything which the outside enemy could do; their
wives and children were exposed to such extreme indignities as are only
inflicted when cities are stormed and sacked. A report reached them
that succours were coming from Tarentum and from the Samnites. They
considered that they had more Samnites than they wanted already within
their walls, but the force from Tarentum composed of Greeks, they were
prepared to welcome, being Greeks themselves, and through their means
they hoped to resist the Samnites and the Nolans no less than the
Romans. At last, surrender to the Romans seemed the less of the two
evils. Charilaus and Nymphius, the leading men in the city, arranged
with one another the respective parts they were to play. One was to
desert to the Roman commander, the other to remain in the city and
prepare it for the successful execution of their plot. Charilaus was
the one who went to Publilius Philo. After expressing the hope that all
might turn out for the good and happiness of Palaeopolis and Rome, he
went on to say that he had decided to deliver up the fortifications.
Whether in doing this he should be found to have preserved his country
or betrayed it depended upon the Roman sense of honour. For himself he
made no terms and asked for no conditions, but for his countrymen he
begged rather than stipulated that if his design succeeded the people
of Rome should take into consideration the eagerness with which they
sought to renew the old friendly relations, and the risk attending
their action rather than their folly and recklessness in breaking the
old ties of duty. The Roman commander
gave his approval to the proposed scheme and furnished him with 3000
men to seize that part of the city which was in the occupation of the
Samnites. L. Quinctius, a military tribune, was in command of this
force.
Ab urbe condita 8.26
Nymphius at the same time approached the Samnite praetor and persuaded
him, now that the whole of the Roman fighting force was either round
Palaeopolis or engaged in Samnium, to allow him to sail round with the
fleet to the Roman seaboard and ravage not only the coastal districts
but even the country close to the city. But to ensure secrecy he
pointed out that it would be necessary to start by night, and that the
ships should be at once launched. To expedite matters the whole of the
Samnite troops, with the exception of those who were mounting guard in
the city, were sent down to the shore. Here they were so crowded as to
impede one another's movements and the confusion was heightened by the
darkness and the contradictory orders which Nymphius was giving in
order to gain time. Meantime Charilaus had been admitted by his
confederates into the city. When the Romans had completely occupied the
highest parts of the city, he ordered them to raise a shout, on which
the Greeks, acting on the instructions of their leaders kept quiet. The
Nolans escaped at the other end of the city and took the road to Nola.
The Samnites, shut out as they were from the city, had less difficulty
in getting away, but when once out of danger they found themselves in a
much more sorry flight. They had no arms, there was nothing they
possessed which was not left behind with the enemy; they returned home
stripped and destitute, an object of derision not only to foreigners
but even to their own countrymen. I am quite aware that there is
another view of this transaction, according to which it was the
Samnites who surrendered, but in the above account I have followed the
authorities whom I consider most worthy of credit. Neapolis became
subsequently the chief seat of the Greek population, and the fact of a
treaty being made with that city renders it all the more probable that
the re- establishment of friendly relations was due to them. As it was
generally believed that the enemy had been forced by the siege to come
to terms, a triumph was decreed to Publilius. Two circumstances
happened in connection with his consulship which had never happened
before-a prolongation of command and a triumph after he had laid down
his command.
Ab urbe condita 8.27
This was followed almost immediately by a war with the Greeks on the
eastern coast. The Tarentines had encouraged the people of Palaeopolis
through their long resistance with vain hopes of succour, and when they
heard that the Romans had got possession of the place they severely
blamed the Palaeopolitans for leaving them in the lurch, as though they
were quite guiltless of having behaved in a similar manner themselves.
They were furious with the Romans, especially after they found that the
Lucanians and Apulians had established friendly relations with them-for
it was in this year that the alliance had been formed-and they realised
that they would be the next to be involved. They saw that it must soon
become a question of either fighting Rome or submitting to her, and
that their whole future in fact depended upon the result of the Samnite
war. That nation stood out alone, and even their strength was
inadequate for the struggle, now that the Lucanians had abandoned them.
They believed, however, that these could still be brought back and
induced to desert the Roman alliance, if sufficient skill were shown in
sowing the seeds of discord between them. These arguments found general
acceptance among a people who were fickle and restless, and some young
Lucanians, distinguished for their unscrupulousness rather than for
their sense of honour, were bribed to make themselves tools of the war
party. After scourging one another with rods they presented themselves
with their backs exposed, in the popular Assembly, and loudly
complained that after they had ventured inside the Roman camp, they had
been scourged by the consul's orders and were within an ace of losing
their heads. The affair had an ugly look, and the visible evidence
removed any suspicion of fraud. The Assembly became greatly excited,
and amidst loud shouts insisted upon the magistrates convening the
senate. When it assembled the senators were surrounded by a crowd of
spectators who clamoured for war with Rome, whilst others went off into
the country to rouse the peasantry to arms. Even the coolest heads were
carried away by the tumult of popular feeling; a decree was passed that
a fresh alliance should be made with the Samnites, and negotiations
were opened with them accordingly. The Samnites did not feel much
confidence in this sudden and apparently groundless change of policy,
and the Lucanians were obliged to give hostages and allow the Samnites
to garrison their fortified places. Blinded by the imposition that had
been practiced on them and by their furious resentment at it, they
made no difficulty about accepting these terms. Shortly afterwards,
when the authors of the false charges had removed to Tarentum, they
began to see how they had been hoodwinked, but it was then too late,
events were no longer in their power, and nothing remained but
unavailing repentance.
Ab urbe condita 8.28
This year (326 B.C.) was marked by the dawn, as it were, of a new era
of liberty for the plebs; creditors were no longer allowed to attach
the persons of their debtors. This change in the law was brought about
by a signal instance of lust and cruelty upon the part of a
moneylender. L. Papirius was the man in question. C. Publilius had
pledged his person to him for a debt which his father had contracted.
The youth and beauty of the debtor which ought to have called forth
feelings of compassion only acted as incentives to lust and insult.
Finding that his infamous proposals only filled the youth with horror
and loathing, the man reminded him that he was absolutely in his power
and sought to terrify him by threats. As these failed to crush the
boy's noble instincts, he ordered him to be stripped and beaten.
Mangled and bleeding the boy rushed into the street and loudly
complained of the usurer's lust and brutality. A vast crowd gathered,
and on learning what had happened became furious at the outrage offered
to one of such tender years, reminding them as it did of the conditions
under which they and their children were living. They ran into the
Forum and from there in a compact body to the Senate-house. In face of
this sudden outbreak the consuls felt it necessary to convene a meeting
of the senate at once, and as the members entered the House the crowd
exhibited the lacerated back of the youth and flung themselves at the
feet of the senators as they passed in one by one. The strongest bond
and support of credit was there and then overthrown through the mad
excesses of one individual. The consuls were instructed by the senate
to lay before the people a proposal "that no man be kept in irons or in
the stocks, except such as have been guilty of some crime, and then
only till they have worked out their sentence; and, further, that the
goods and not the person of the debtor shall be the security for the
debt." So the nexi were released, and it was forbidden for any to
become nexi in the future.
Ab urbe condita 8.29
The Samnite war, the sudden dejection of the Lucanians, and the fact
that the Tarentines had been the instigators were quite sufficient in
themselves to cause the senators anxiety. Fresh trouble, however, arose
this year through the action of the Vestinians, who made common cause
with the Samnites. The matter had been a good deal discussed, though it
had not yet occupied the attention of the government. In the following
year, however, the new consuls, L. Furius Camillus and Junius Brutus
Scaeva, made it the very first question to bring before the senate.
Though the subject was no new one, yet it was felt to be so serious
that the senators shrank from either taking it up or refusing to deal
with it. They were afraid that if they left that nation unpunished, the
neighbouring states might be encouraged to make a similar display of
wanton arrogance, while to punish them by force of arms might lead
others to fear similar treatment and arouse feelings of resentment. In
fact, the whole of these nations-the Marsi, the Paeligni, and the
Marrucini-were quite as warlike as the Samnites, and in case the
Vestinians were attacked would have to be reckoned with as enemies. The
victory, however, rested with that party in the senate who seemed at
the time to possess more daring than prudence, but the result showed
that Fortune favours the bold. The people, with the sanction of the
senate, resolved on war with the Vestinians. The conduct of that war
fell by lot to Brutus, the war in Samnium to Camillus. Armies were
marched into both countries, and by carefully watching the frontiers
the enemy were prevented from effecting a junction. The consul who had
the heavier task, L. Furius, was overtaken by a serious illness and was
obliged to resign his command. He was ordered to nominate a Dictator to
carry on the campaign, and he nominated L. Papirius Cursor, the
foremost soldier of his day, Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus being
appointed Master of the Horse. The two distinguished themselves by
their conduct in the field, but they made themselves still more famous
by the conflict which broke out between them, and which almost led to
fatal consequences. The other consul, Brutus, carried on an active
campaign amongst the Vestinians without meeting with a single reverse.
He ravaged the fields and burnt the farm buildings and crops of enemy,
and at last drove him reluctantly into action. A pitched battle was
fought, and he inflicted such a defeat on the Vestinians, though with
heavy loss on his own side also, that they fled to their camp, but not
feeling sufficiently protected by fosse and rampart they dispersed in
scattered parties to their towns, trusting to their strong positions
and stone walls for their defence. Brutus now commenced an attack upon
their towns. The first to be taken was Cutina, which he carried by
escalade, after a hot assault by his men, who were eager to avenge the
heavy losses they had sustained in the previous battle. This was
followed by the capture of Cingilia. He gave the spoil of both cities
to his troops as a reward for their having surmounted the walls and
gates of the enemy.
Ab urbe condita 8.30
The advance into Samnium was made under doubtful auspices. This
circumstance did not portend the result of the campaign, for that was
quite favourable, but it did forshadow the insane passion which the
commanders displayed. Papirius was warned by the pullarius that it
would be necessary to take the auspices afresh. On his departure for
Rome for this purpose, he strictly charged the Master of the Horse to
keep within his lines and not to engage the enemy. After he had gone Q.
Fabius learnt from his scouts that the enemy were showing as much
carelessness as if there were not a single Roman in Samnium. Whether it
was that his youthful temper resented everything being dependent on the
Dictator, or whether he was tempted by the chance offered him of a
brilliant success, at any rate, after making the necessary preparations
and dispositions he advanced as far as Inbrinium- for so is the
district called-and fought a battle with the Samnites. Such was the
fortune of the fight that had the Dictator himself been present he
could have done nothing to make the success more complete. The general
did not disappoint his men, nor did the men disappoint their general.
The cavalry made repeated charges but failed to break through the
massed force opposed to them, and acting on the advice of L. Cominius,
a military tribune, they removed the bits from their horses and spurred
them on so furiously that nothing could withstand them. Riding down men
and armour they spread carnage far and wide. The infantry followed them
and completed the disorder of the enemy. It is said that they lost
20,000 men that day. Some authorities whom I have consulted state that
there were two battles fought in the Dictator's absence, and each was a
brilliant success. In the oldest writers, however, only one battle is
mentioned, and some annalists omit the incident altogether.
In consequence of the vast number slain, a large amount of spoil in the
shape of armour and weapons was picked up on the battle-field, and the
Master of the Horse had this collected into a huge heap and burnt. His
object may have been to discharge a vow to some deity. But if we are to
trust the authority of Fabius, he did this to prevent the Dictator from
reaping the fruits of his glory, or carrying the spoils in his triumph
and
afterwards placing his name upon them. The fact also of his sending the
despatches announcing his victory to the senate and not to the Dictator
would seem to show that he was by no means anxious to allow him any
share in the credit of it. At all events the Dictator took it in that
light, and whilst everybody else was jubilant at the victory which had
been won, he wore an expression of gloom and wrath. He abruptly
dismissed the senate and hurried from the Senate-house, repeatedly
exclaiming that the authority and dignity of the Dictator would be as
completely overthrown by the Master of the Horse as the Samnite legions
had been if this contempt of his orders were to remain unpunished. In
this angry and menacing mood, he started with all possible speed for
the camp. He was unable, however, to reach it before news arrived of
his approach, for messengers had started from the City in advance of
him, bringing word that the Dictator was coming bent on vengeance, and
almost every other word he uttered was in praise of T. Manlius.
Ab urbe condita 8.31
Fabius immediately summoned his troops to assembly, and appealed to
them to show the same courage with which they had defended the republic
from a brave and determined foe in protecting from the unrestrained
ferocity of the Dictator the man under whose auspices and generalship
they had been victorious. He was coming, maddened by jealousy,
exasperated at another man's merits and good fortune, furious because
the republic had triumphed in his absence. If it were in his power to
change the fortune of the day, he would rather that victory rested with
the Samnites than with the Romans. He kept talking about the contempt
of orders as though the reason why he forbade all fighting were not
precisely the same as that which makes him vexed now that we have
fought. Then, prompted by jealousy, he wanted to suppress the merits of
others and deprive of their arms men who were most eager to use them,
so as to prevent their being employed in his absence; now he is
exasperated and furious because the soldiers were not crippled or
defenceless though L. Papirius was not with them, and because Q. Fabius
considered himself Master of the Horse and not the lacquey of the
Dictator. What would he have done if, as often happens amid the chances
of war, the battle had gone against us, seeing that now, after the
enemy has been thoroughly defeated and a victory won for the republic
which even under his
unrivalled generalship could not have been more complete, he is
actually menacing the Master of the Horse with punishment! He would,
were it in his power, treat all with equal severity, not only the
Master of Horse but the military tribunes, the centurions, the men of
the rank and file. Jealousy, like lightning, strikes the summits, and
because he cannot reach all he has selected one man as his victim whom
he regards as the chief conspirator- your general. If he should succeed
in crushing him and quenching the splendour of his success, he will
treat this army as a victor treats the vanquished and with the same
ruthlessness which he has been allowed to practice on the Master of the
Horse. In defending his cause they will be defending the liberty of
all. If the Dictator sees that the army is as united in guarding its
victory as it was in fighting for it, and that one man's safety is the
common concern of all, he will bring himself to a calmer frame of mind.
His closing words were: " I entrust my fortunes and my life to your
fidelity and courage." His words were greeted with universal shouts of
approval. They told him not to be dismayed or depressed, no man should
harm him while the legions of Rome were alive.
Ab urbe condita 8.32
Not long after this the Dictator appeared, and at once ordered the
trumpet to sound the Assembly. When silence was restored an usher
summoned Q. Fabius, the Master of the Horse. He advanced and stood
immediately below the Dictator's tribunal. The Dictator began: "Quintus
Fabius, inasmuch as the Dictator possesses supreme authority, to which
the consuls who exercise the old kingly power, and the praetors who are
elected under the same auspices as the consuls alike submit, I ask you
whether or not you think it right and fitting that the Master of the
Horse should bow to that authority? Further, I ask you whether as I was
aware that I had left the City under doubtful auspices I ought to have
jeopardised the safety of the republic in the face of this religious
difficulty, or whether I ought to have taken the auspices afresh and so
avoided any action till the pleasure of the gods was known? I should
also like to know whether, if a religious impediment prevents the
Dictator from acting, the Master of the Horse is at liberty to consider
himself free and unhampered by such impediment? But why am I putting
these questions? Surely, if I had gone away without leaving any orders,
you ought to have used your judgment in interpreting my wishes and
acted accordingly. Answer me this, rather: Did
I forbid you to take any action in my absence? Did I forbid you to
engage the enemy? In contempt of my orders, whilst the auspices were
still indecisive and the sanctions of religion withheld, you dared to
give battle, in defiance of all the military custom and discipline of
our ancestors, in defiance of the will of the gods. Answer the
questions put to you, but beware of uttering a single word about
anything else. Lictor, stand by him!"
Fabius found it far from easy to reply to each question in detail, and
protested against the same man being both accuser and judge in a matter
of life and death. He exclaimed that it would be easier to deprive him
of his life than of the glory he had won, and went on to exculpate
himself and bring charges against the Dictator. Papirius in a fresh
outburst of rage ordered the Master of the Horse to be stripped and the
rods and axes to be got ready. Fabius appealed to the soldiers for
help, and as the lictors began to tear off his clothes, he retreated
behind the triarii who were now raising a tumult. Their shouts were
taken up through the whole concourse, threats and entreaties were heard
everywhere. Those nearest the tribunal, who could be recognised as
being within view of the Dictator implored him to spare the Master of
the Horse and not with him to condemn the whole army; those furthest
off and the men who had closed round Fabius reviled the Dictator as
unfeeling and merciless. Matters were rapidly approaching a mutiny.
Even those on the tribunal did not remain quiet; the staff officers who
were standing round the Dictator's chair begged him to adjourn the
proceedings to the following day to allow his anger to cool and give
time for quiet consideration. They urged that the youthful spirit of
Fabius had been sufficiently chastened and his victory sufficiently
sullied; they begged him not to push his punishment to extremities or
to brand with ignominy not only a youth of exceptional merit but also
his distinguished father and the whole Fabian house. When they found
their arguments and entreaties alike unavailing, they asked him to look
at the angry multitude in front. To add fire to men whose tempers were
already inflamed and to provide the materials for a mutiny was, they
said, unworthy of a man of his age and experience. If a mutiny did
occur, no one would throw the blame of it upon Q. Fabius, who was only
deprecating punishment; the sole responsibility would lie on the
Dictator for having in his blind passion provoked the multitude to a
deplorable struggle with him. And as a final argument they declared
that to prevent him from supposing that they were actuated by any
personal feeling in favour of Fabius, they were prepared to
state on oath that they considered the infliction of punishment on
Fabius under present circumstances to be detrimental to the interests
of the State.
Ab urbe condita 8.33
These remonstrances only irritated the Dictator against them instead of
making him more peaceably disposed towards Fabius, and he ordered them
to leave the tribunal. In vain the ushers demanded silence, neither the
Dictator's voice nor those of his officers could be heard owing to the
noise and uproar; at last night put an end to the conflict as though it
had been a battle. The Master of the Horse was ordered to appear on the
following day. As, however, everybody assured him that Papirius was so
upset and embittered by the resistance he had met with that he would be
more furious than ever, Fabius left the camp secretly and reached Rome
in the night. On the advice of his father, M. Fabius, who had been
thrice consul as well as Dictator a meeting of the senate was at once
summoned. Whilst his son was describing to the senators the violence
and injustice of the Dictator, suddenly the noise of the lictors
clearing the way in front of the Senate-house was heard and the
Dictator himself appeared, having followed him up with some light
cavalry as soon as he heard that he had quitted the camp. Then the
contention began again, and Papirius ordered Fabius to be arrested.
Though not only the leaders of the senate but the whole House sought to
deprecate his wrath, he remained unmoved and persisted in his purpose.
Then M. Fabius, the father, said: "Since neither the authority of the
senate nor the years which I, whom you are preparing to bereave of a
son have reached, nor the noble birth and personal merits of the Master
of the Horse whom you yourself appointed, and entreaties such as have
often mitigated the fierceness of human foes and pacified the anger of
offended deities-since none of these move you-I claim the intervention
of the tribunes of the plebs and appeal to the people. As you are
seeking to escape from the judgment which the army has passed upon you
and which the senate is passing now, I summon you before the one judge
who has at all events more power and authority than your Dictatorship.
I shall see whether you will submit to an appeal to which a Roman
king-Tullus Hotilius-submitted." He at once left the Senate-house for
the Assembly. Thither the Dictator also proceeded with a small party,
whilst the Master of the Horse was accompanied by all the leaders of
the senate in a body. They had both taken their places on the rostra
when
Papirius ordered Fabius to be removed to the space below. His father
followed him and turned to Papirius with the remark, "You do well to
order us to be removed to a position from which we can speak as private
citizens."
For some time regular debate was out of the question, nothing was heard
but mutual altercations. At last the loud and indignant tones of the
elder Fabius rose above the hubbub as he expatiated on the tyranny and
brutality of Papirius. He himself, he said, had been Dictator, and not
a single person, not a single plebeian, whether centurion or private
soldier, had ever suffered any wrong from him. But Papirius would wrest
victory and triumph from a Roman commander just as he would from
hostile generals. What a difference there was between the moderation
shown by the men of old and this new fashion of ruthless severity! The
Dictator, Quinctius Cincinnatus, rescued the consul, L. Minucius, from
a blockade, and the only punishment he inflicted was to leave him as
second in command of the army. L. Furius, after expressing his contempt
for the age and authority of M. F. Camillus, incurred a most
disgraceful defeat, but Camillus not only checked his anger for the
moment and refrained from putting in his despatches to the people, or
rather to the senate, anything reflecting on his colleague, but on his
return to Rome, after the senate had allowed him to choose from the
consular tribunes one to be associated with him in his command, he
actually chose L. Furius. Why, even the people themselves, who hold in
their hands the sovereign power, have never allowed their feelings to
carry them beyond the imposition of a fine even where armies have been
lost through the foolhardiness or ignorance of their generals. Never up
to this day has a commander-in-chief been tried for his life because he
was defeated. But now generals who have won victories and earned the
most splendid triumphs are threatened with the rods and axes, a
treatment which the laws of war forbid even to the vanquished. What, he
asked, would his son have suffered if he had met with defeat, been
routed and stripped of his camp? Could that man's rage and violence go
beyond scourging and killing? It was owing to Q. Fabius that the State
was offering up joyous and grateful thanksgivings for victory; it was
on his account that the sacred fanes stood open and prayers and
libations were being offered at the altars, and the smoke of sacrifice
was ascending. How fitting it was that this very man should be stripped
and torn with rods before the eyes of the Roman people, in sight of the
Capitol and the Citadel, in sight of the gods whom he invoked in two
battles nor invoked in vain! What would be the feelings of the army who
had won their
victories under his auspices and generalship? What grief would there be
in the Roman camp, what exultation among the enemy! The old man wept
bitterly as he uttered these protests and expostulations, ever and anon
throwing his arms round his son and appealing for help to gods and men.
Ab urbe condita 8.34
He had on his side the support of the august and venerable senate, the
sympathy of the people, the protection of the tribunes, and the
remembrance of the absent army. On the other side were pleaded the
unquestioned sovereign power of the Roman people and all the traditions
of military discipline, the Dictator's edict which had ever been
regarded as possessing divine sanction, and the example of Manlius who
had sacrificed his affection for his son to the interests of the State.
Brutus too, urged the Dictator, the founder of Roman freedom, had done
this before in the case of his two children. Now fathers were
indulgent, and aged men, easy- going in matters that do not touch
themselves, were spoiling the young men, teaching them to despise
authority and treating military discipline as of little importance. He
declared his intention of adhering to his purpose, he would not abate a
single jot of the punishment due to the man who had fought in defiance
of his injunctions' while the auspices were doubtful and the religious
sanction withheld. Whether the supreme authority of the Dictator was to
remain unimpaired did not depend on him; he, L. Papirius, would do
nothing to weaken its power. He sincerely hoped that the tribunes would
not use their authority, itself inviolable, to violate by their
interference the sovereignty of the Roman government, and that the
people to whom the appeal had been made would not extinguish in his
case especially Dictator and Dictatorship alike. "If it did, it will
not be L. Papirius but the tribunes, the corrupt judgment of the people
that posterity will accuse and accuse in vain. When the bond of
military discipline has once been broken no soldier will obey his
centurion, no centurion his military tribune, no military tribune his
general, no Master of the Horse the Dictator. No one will have any
reverence or respect for either men or gods, no observance will be
shown to the orders of commanders or the auspices under which they
acted. Without obtaining leave of absence soldiers will roam at will
through friendly or hostile country; in total disregard of their
military oath they will abandon their standards when and where they
chose, they will refuse to assemble when ordered, they will fight
regardless of day or night, whether the ground were favourable or
unfavourable, whether their commander has given orders or not, keeping
no formation, no order. Military service, instead of being the solemn
and sacred thing it is, will resemble wild and disorderly brigandage.
Expose yourselves, tribunes, to all future ages as the authors of these
evils! Make yourselves personally responsible for the criminal
recklessness of Q. Fabius!"
Ab urbe condita 8.35
The tribunes were dismayed and felt more anxiety now about their own
position than about the man who had sought their protection. They were
relieved from their heavy responsibility by the action of the people;
the whole Assembly appealed to the Dictator and besought him with
earnest entreaties that he would for their sakes forego inflicting
punishment on the Master of the Horse. When the tribunes saw the turn
matters had taken they added their entreaties also, and implored the
Dictator to make allowance for human frailty and to pardon Q. Fabius
for an error natural to youth, for he had already suffered punishment
enough. And now the youth himself, and even his father, abandoning all
further contention, fell on their knees and sought to turn aside the
Dictator's anger. At last, when silence was restored, the Dictator
spoke. "This, Quirites," he said, "is as it should be. Military
discipline has conquered, the supreme authority of government has
prevailed; it was a question whether either would survive this day's
proceedings. Q. Fabius is not acquitted of guilt in having fought
against his commander's orders, but though condemned as guilty he is
restored as a free gift to the people of Rome, to the authority of the
tribunes, who protected him not by exercising their legal powers but by
their intercession. Live, Q. Fabius; happier now in the unanimous
desire of your fellow-citizens to defend you than in the hour of
exultation after your victory! Live, though you dared to do what even
your father, had he been in the place of Papirius, could not have
pardoned! As for me, you shall be restored to favour whenever you
please. But to the Roman people to whom you owe your life you can make
no better return than to show that you have this day learnt the lesson
of submission to lawful commands in peace and in war." After announcing
that he would no longer detain the Master of the Horse he left the
rostra. The joyful senate, the still more joyful people, flocked round
the Dictator and the Master of the Horse, and congratulated
them on the result and then escorted them to their homes. It was felt
that military authority had been strengthened no less by the peril in
which Q. Fabius had been placed than by the terrible punishment of
young Manlius. It so happened that on each occasion on which the
Dictator was absent from the army, the Samnites showed increased
activity. M. Valerius, however, the second in command, who was in
charge of the camp, had the example of Q. Fabius before his eyes and
dreaded the stern Dictator's anger more than an attack from the enemy.
A foraging party were ambushed and cut to pieces, and it was commonly
believed that they could have been relieved from the camp had not the
commanding officer been deterred by the peremptory orders he had
received. This incident still further embittered the feelings of the
soldiers who were already incensed against the Dictator owing to his
implacable attitude towards Fabius and then to his having pardoned him
at the request of the people after having refused to do so on their
intercession.
Ab urbe condita 8.36
After placing L. Papirius Crassus in command of the City and
prohibiting Q. Fabius from any action in his capacity of Master of the
Horse, the Dictator returned to the camp. His arrival was not viewed
with much pleasure by his own men, nor did it create any alarm amongst
the enemy. For the very next day, either unaware of his presence or
regarding it of small importance whether he were present or absent,
they marched towards the camp in order of battle. And yet so much
depended upon that one man, L. Papirius, such care did he show in
choosing his ground and posting his reserves, so far did he strengthen
his force in every way that military skill could suggest, that if the
general's tactics had been backed up by the goodwill of the troops it
was considered absolutely certain that the Samnite war would that day
have been brought to a close. As it was, the soldiers showed no energy;
they deliberately threw the victory away that their commander's
reputation might be damaged. The Samnites lost a larger proportion of
killed, the Romans had more wounded. The quick eye of the general saw
what prevented his success, and he realised that he must curb his
temper and soften his sternness by greater affability. He went round
the camp accompanied by his staff and visited the wounded, putting his
head inside their tents and asking them how they were getting on, and
commending them individually by name to the care of his staff officers,
the military tribunes, and prefects. In adopting this course, which
naturally tended to make him popular, he showed so much tact that the
feelings of the men were much sooner won over to their commander now
that their bodies were being properly looked after. Nothing conduced
more to their recovery than the gratitude they felt for his attention.
When the health of the army was completely restored he gave battle to
the enemy, both he and his men feeling quite confident of victory, and
he so completely defeated and routed the Samnites that this was the
last occasion on which they ventured on a regular engagement with the
Dictator. After this the victorious army advanced in every direction
where there was any prospect of plunder, but wherever they marched they
found no armed force; they were nowhere openly attacked or surprised
from ambush. They showed all the greater alertness because the Dictator
had issued an order that the whole of the spoil was to be given to the
soldiers; the chance of private gain stimulated their warlike spirit
quite as much as the consciousness that they were avenging the wrongs
of their country. Cowed by these defeats, the Samnites made overtures
for peace and gave the Dictator an undertaking to supply each of the
soldiers with a set of garments and a year's pay. On his referring them
to the senate they replied that they would follow him to Rome and trust
their cause solely to his honour and rectitude. The army was thereupon
withdrawn from Samnium.
Ab urbe condita 8.37
The Dictator made a triumphal entry into the City, and as he wished to
lay down his office, he received instructions from the senate before
doing so to conduct the consular elections. The new consuls were C.
Sulpicius Longus (for the second time) and Q. Aemilius Cerretanus. The
Samnites did not succeed in obtaining a permanent peace, as they could
not agree on the conditions; they took back with them a truce for one
year. But even this was soon broken, for when they heard that Papirius
had resigned they were eager to renew hostilities. The new consuls-some
authorities give Aulus instead of Aemilius for the second consul-had on
their hands a fresh enemy, the Apulians, in addition to the revolt of
the Samnites. Armies were despatched against both; the Samnites were
allotted to Sulpicius, the Apulians to Aemilius. Some writers assert
that it was not against the Apulians that the campaign was undertaken,
but for the protection of their allies against the wanton aggressions
of the Samnites. The circumstances
of that people, however, who were hardly able to defend themselves,
make it more probable that they had not attacked the Apulians but that
both nations were united in hostilities against Rome. Nothing
noteworthy took place; the districts of both Samnium and Apulia were
laid waste, but neither in the one nor the other was the enemy met
with. At Rome the citizens were one night suddenly aroused from sleep
by an alarm so serious that the Capitol, the Citadel, the walls, and
gates were filled with troops. The whole population was called to arms,
but when it grew light neither the author nor the cause of the
excitement was discovered. In this year M. Flavius, a tribune of the
plebs, brought before the people a proposal to take measures against
the Tusculans, "by whose counsel and assistance the peoples of Velitrae
and Privernum had made war against the people of Rome." The people of
Tusculum came to Rome with their wives and children in mourning garb,
like men awaiting trial, and went from tribe to tribe prostrating
themselves before the tribesmen. The compassion which their attitude
called out went further to procure their pardon than their attempts to
exculpate themselves. All the tribes, with the exception of the Pollian
tribe, vetoed the proposal. That tribe voted for a proposal that all
the adult males should be scourged and beheaded, and their wives and
children sold into slavery. Even as late as the last generation the
Tusculans retained the memory of that cruel sentence, and their
resentment against its authors showed itself in the fact that the
Papirian tribe (in which the Tusculans were afterwards incorporated)
hardly ever voted for any candidate belonging to the Pollian tribe.
Ab urbe condita 8.38
Q. Fabius and L. Fulvius were the consuls for the following year. The
war in Samnium was threatening to take a more serious turn, as it was
stated that mercenary troops had been hired from the neighbouring
states. The apprehensions created led to the nomination of A. Cornelius
Arvina as Dictator, with M. Fabius Ambustus as Master of the Horse.
These commanders carried out the enrolment with unusual strictness, and
led an exceptionally fine army into Samnium. But although they were on
hostile territory, they exercised as little caution in choosing the
site for their camp as though the enemy had been at a great distance.
Suddenly the Samnite legions advanced with such boldness that they
encamped with their rampart close to the Roman outposts. The approach
of night prevented
them from making an immediate attack; they disclosed their intention as
soon as it grew light the next morning. The Dictator saw that a battle
was nearer than he expected, and he determined to abandon a position
which would hamper the courage of his men. Leaving a number of
watch-fires alight to deceive the enemy, he silently withdrew his
troops, but owing to the proximity of the camps his movement was not
unobserved. The Samnite cavalry immediately followed on his heels but
refrained from actual attack till it grew lighter, nor did the infantry
emerge from their camp before daybreak. As soon as they could see, the
cavalry began to harass the Roman rear, and by pressing upon them where
difficult ground had to be crossed, considerably delayed their advance.
Meantime the infantry had come up, and now the entire force of the
Samnites was pressing on the rear of the column.
As the Dictator saw that no further advance was possible without heavy
loss, he ordered the ground he was holding to be measured out for a
camp. But as the enemy's cavalry was gradually enveloping them, it was
impossible to procure wood for the stockade or to commence their
entrenchment. Finding that to go forward and to remain where he was
were equally out of the question, the Dictator ordered the baggage to
be removed from the column and collected and the line of battle formed.
The enemy formed also into line, equally matched in courage and in
strength. Their confidence was increased by their attributing the
retirement of the Romans to fear and not, as was actually the case, to
the disadvantageous position of their camp. This made the fight for
some considerable time an even one, though the Samnites had long been
unaccustomed to stand the battle-shout of the Romans. We read that
actually from nine o'clock till two in the afternoon the contest was
maintained so equally on both sides that the shout which was raised at
the first onset was never repeated, the standards neither advanced nor
retreated, in no direction was there any giving way. They fought, each
man keeping his ground, pressing forward with their shields, neither
looking back nor pausing for breath. Their noise and tumult never grew
weaker, the fighting went on perfectly steadily, and it looked as if it
would only be terminated by the complete exhaustion of the combatants
or the approach of night. By this time the men were beginning to lose
their strength and the sword its vigour, whilst the generals were
baffled. A troop of Samnite cavalry, who had ridden some distance round
the Roman rear, discovered that their baggage was lying at a distance
from the combatants without any guard or protection of any kind. On
learning this the whole of the cavalry rode up to it eager to secure
the plunder. A messenger in hot haste reported this to the Dictator,
who remarked: "All right, let them encumber themselves with spoil."
Then the soldiers one after another began to exclaim that their
belongings were being plundered and carried off. The Dictator sent for
the Master of the Horse. "Do you see," he said, "M. Fabius, that the
enemy's cavalry have left the fight? They are hampering and impeding
themselves with our baggage. Attack them whilst they are scattered, as
plundering parties always are; you will find very few of them in the
saddle, very few with swords in their hands. Cut them down whilst they
are loading their horses with spoil, with no weapons to defend
themselves, and make it a bloody spoil for them! I will look after the
infantry battle, the glory of the cavalry victory shall be yours."
Ab urbe condita 8.39
The cavalry force, riding in perfect order, charged the enemy whilst
scattered and hampered by their plunder and filled the whole place with
carnage. Incapable of either resistance or flight they were cut down
amongst the packages which they had thrown away and over which their
startled horses were stumbling. After almost annihilating the enemy's
cavalry, M. Fabius led his cavalry by a short circuit round the main
battle and attacked the Samnite infantry from behind. The fresh
shouting which arose in that direction threw them into a panic, and
when the Dictator saw the men in front looking round, the standards
getting into confusion, and the whole line wavering, he called upon his
men and encouraged them to fresh efforts; he appealed to the military
tribunes and first centurions by name to join him in renewing the
fight. They again raised the battle-shout and pressed forward, and
wherever they advanced they saw more and more demoralisation amongst
the enemy. The cavalry were now within view of those in front, and
Cornelius, turning round to his maniples, indicated as well as he could
by voice and hand that he recognised the standards and bucklers of his
own cavalry. No sooner did they see and hear them than, forgetting the
toil and travail they had endured for almost a whole day, forgetting
their wounds, and as eager as though they had just emerged fresh from
their camp after receiving the signal for battle, they flung themselves
on the enemy. The Samnites could no longer bear up against the terrible
onset of the cavalry behind them and the fierce charge of the infantry
in front. A large number were killed between the two, many were
scattered in flight. The infantry accounted for those who were hemmed
in and stood their ground, the cavalry created slaughter among the
fugitives; amongst those killed was their commander-in-chief.
This battle completely broke down the resistance; so much so that in
all their councils peace was advocated. It could not, they said, be a
matter of surprise that they met with no success in an unblest war,
undertaken in defiance of treaty obligations, where the gods were more
justly incensed against them than men. That war would have to be
expiated and atoned for at a great cost. The only question was whether
they should pay the penalty by sacrificing the few who were guilty or
shedding the innocent blood of all. Some even went so far as to name
the instigators of the war. One name, especially, was generally
denounced, that of Brutulus Papius. He was an aristocrat and possessed
great influence, and there was not a shadow of doubt that it was he who
had brought about the breach of the recent truce. The praetors found
themselves compelled to submit a decree which the council passed,
ordering Brutulus Papius to be surrendered and all the prisoners and
booty taken from the Romans to be sent with him to Rome, and further
that the redress which the fetials had demanded in accordance with
treaty-rights should be made as law and justice demanded. Brutulus
escaped the ignominy and punishment which awaited him by a voluntary
death, but the decree was carried out; the fetials were sent to Rome
with the dead body, and all his property was surrendered with him. None
of this, however, was accepted by the Romans beyond the prisoners and
whatever articles amongst the spoil were identified by the owners; so
far as anything else was concerned, the surrender was fruitless. The
senate decreed a triumph for the Dictator.
Ab urbe condita 8.40
Some authorities state that this war was managed by the consuls and it
was they who celebrated the triumph over the Samnites, and further that
Fabius invaded Apulia and brought away great quantities of spoil. There
is no discrepancy as to A. Cornelius having been Dictator that year,
the only doubt is whether he was appointed to conduct the war, or
whether, owing to the serious illness of L. Plautius, the praetor, he
was appointed to give the signal for starting the chariot races, and
after discharging this not very noteworthy function resigned office. It
is difficult to decide which account or which authority to prefer. I
believe that the true history has been
falsified by funeral orations and lying inscriptions on the family
busts, since each family appropriates to itself an imaginary record of
noble deeds and official distinctions. It is at all events owing to
this cause that so much confusion has been introduced into the records
of private careers and public events. There is no writer of those times
now extant who was contemporary with the events he relates and whose
authority, therefore, can be depended upon.
End of Book 8
|