Ancient texts
Liv. (23.29)
| Date: | late 216 bc |
| Romans | |
| Consul: | bros Cornelius Scipio |
| Inf.: | 2x 2 legions |
| Cav.: | as usual ? |
| Casualties: | ? |
| Remarks: | |
| Enemy: | Carthaginians |
| Leader: | Hasdrubal Barca |
| Inf.: | ± equal to Romans |
| Cav.: | 2x Roman strength +eleph |
| Casualties: | many |
| Remarks: |
Phase I
Battle of Ibera phase I
True or not, the rumour, Hasdrubal was about to bring his army to Italy, was also known by the Roman proconsul P. Cornelius Scipio and his brother Gnaeus.
This knowledge caused them to attack Hasdrubal directly. The armies met near the city of Ibera named after the river Ibero (Ebro).
As usual Livius doesn't tell us very much about the details, so we have to asume the armies were both pretty much as usual.
Hasdrubal placed his Spanish troops in the centre and the Africans and Carthaginians at the wings. Next to those the cavalry and elephants.
Livius tells us Hasdrubal placed his strongest troops in the center, but as can be seen next, those were certainly not his most reliable troops.
Battle of Ibera phase II
The chosen method by the Carthaginians was a very defensive one, but could work if two conditions were met:
In Italy the Romans after the example of Fabius Maximus had chosen not to attack Hannibal in a pitched battle anymore.
Here the two proconsuls did attack, but Hasdrubal's Spanish warriors in the centre were not able to withstand the Roman attack and soon fled. (According to Livius they fled before there was physicle contact with the enemy, but this may be exaggerated).
Phase II
Only once
In fact this (Carthaginian) formation worked well for just one occasion in the 2nd Punic war: The battle of Cannae